In recent years, the pharmaceutical industry has made incredible progress with drugs and devices that can help people live normal, healthy lives. Chronic pain and seemingly insurmountable medical challenges have been solved with a single surgical implant. With a brand new artificial joint, a simple shunt, or pelvic sling, millions of people have been able to enjoy a pain-free existence.

Because of mounting competition in the pharmaceutical device industry, many manufacturers often rush to get the “next big thing” on the market. This can often result in insufficient testing, faulty design, or other negligent oversights in the device. If these products cause harm to consumers, the manufacturers should be held accountable for the damage caused.

How a Defective Medical Device Lawsuit Typically Works

Unfortunately, when a medical device causes one person to be injured or become ill, it has likely had a similar effect on thousands of individuals that also trusted the device. Because of this, the courts could potentially be flooded with thousands of very similar cases.

This is why most defective medical device lawsuits go through multidistrict litigation. In this process, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation—founded in 1968 in response to an antitrust suit involving nearly 2,000 similar cases—will review requests to consolidate similar lawsuits before these cases go to trial.

This allows things that would be shared by the cases—such as discoveries and depositions—to be gathered under a single federal judge. After these proceedings are complete, the individual cases are sent back, or remanded, to the federal court district in which the case originated. The benefit to these multidistrict litigations is that settlements often occur during the consolidated, pretrial period.

Hiring an Experienced Utah Defective Pharmaceutical Device Attorney

James Esparza has over twenty-five years of experience representing clients in defective medical device litigation, protecting their rights and fighting for the compensation that they deserve.

If you or a loved one has suffered complications from a defective medical implant in Utah, such as a hip implant or transvaginal mesh, contact the James Esparza Law Firm at 801-272-9100, or toll free at 1-800-745-4050.

A counterfeit pharmaceutical is any drug that has been made, altered, or inappropriately labeled by an unauthorized source. It is possible for brand name, generic, over-the-counter, and prescription-only drugs to be counterfeited.

Common issues with counterfeit drugs include:

• None of the listed active ingredients
• Too much or too little of active ingredients
• Substituted active ingredient
• No oversight or quality control
• Contaminants
• Expired ingredients
• Altered or fake packaging

Why are counterfeit pharmaceuticals dangerous?

Individuals take medications to deal with specifically targeted health issues. Without proper oversight and quality control, even a drug containing the ingredients the packaging describes could harm the individual taking them.

Some of the risks of taking counterfeit drugs:

• Worsening of existing medical conditions
• Incorrect dosages
• Allergic reactions and side effects
• Hazardous substitutions and contaminants
• May build undesired resistance to drug, as with antibiotics
• Death

How likely is it that a Utah consumer will encounter counterfeit drugs?

In general, due to stringent regulations, counterfeits are much less an issue here than they are in developing countries. However, there have recently been three well-known cases of counterfeit drugs in the American market:

• Lipitor – used to lower cholesterol
• Procrit – which treats anemia
• Alli – aids in weight loss

Unfortunately, counterfeit medication is a growing problem all over the world. Because of these recent breaches and their resulting pharmaceutical injuries, the FDA has dialed up their efforts to protect consumers from dangerous counterfeits.

What can I do to protect my family from pharma fraud?

Always purchase prescription medications from state-licensed pharmacies in the United States. State-licensed pharmacies are subjected to scrutiny and regulations, as opposed to sources from out of the country or on the Internet.

Be sure you know your drug. Inspect packaging and container seals to be sure they haven’t been tampered with. If you notice any changes in the appearance or performance of the drug, follow up as soon as possible with your pharmacist. He or she will be able to tell you if there have been any known manufacturing or distribution changes that may be responsible for the differences, or if there is genuine cause for concern.

While breaches are rare, they do occur. In the rare event of counterfeit pharmaceuticals ending up in a state-licensed pharmacy, remember that:

• You are more likely to hear about the problem through a recall or the news before you are affected.
• It will be easier to trace the breach back to the responsible parties.
• You are more likely to find out what prospective health risks were involved with the fraudulent drug so you can obtain necessary treatments as soon as possible.
• You are more likely to find out who is liable for any Utah pharmaceutical injury resulting from defective drugs.

If you’ve been injured because of a counterfeit or defective drug, you may be eligible to take part in a Utah drug injury lawsuit. To learn more, schedule a no-cost case review with compassionate Salt Lake personal injury attorney James Esparza. Call our offices today at 800-745-4050.

Summer is here and it seems more cyclists are on the road every day. Unfortunately, more time riding your bike increases your risk of a Salt Lake City bicycle collision. It’s enough to keep some cyclists off the roads entirely.

The greater understanding you have of what causes bicycle accidents in Utah and what kind of measures you can take to avoid getting hit, the more you will be able to identify a dangerous situation and take measures to protect yourself before coming to harm.

In part one of this three-part series, we told you about two common auto-bike collisions in Salt Lake City. In this article learn two more ways car-bike crashes occur and what you can do to prevent them.

Types of Bicycle Collisions and How Riders Can Protect Themselves

3. Left-Cross

What happens:  A driver turns left at an intersection, either driving immediately in front of or directly into a cyclist crossing the intersection.

How cyclists can protect themselves:  Again, riding further to the left in your lane will make you more visible. Drivers who are about to make a left turn may be overly focused on oncoming motor vehicles, so cyclists riding very far to the right may not visually register in time. If you coast, a driver may think you are coming to a stop, so keep pedaling as you approach and ride through the intersection. If you haven’t already, learn how to perform an emergency quick turn to avoid getting hit in this scenario. Wear brightly colored clothing, a visibility vest, and a flashing light to make yourself more visible.

4. Drive Out

What happens:  A motor vehicle exiting a side street drives into or in front of a passing cyclist.

How cyclists can protect themselves:  This kind of accident happens most where there are a lot of driveways, side streets, and alleys, so take extra care when riding in areas where these are present. Ride further left so drivers approaching from a side street will be better able to see you in the road. Definitely avoid riding on the shoulder or any area right of the street edge line, as you will be significantly less visible. Again, wear brightly colored clothing, a visibility vest, and a flashing light to make yourself more visible.

For more information about collisions and evasive steering techniques, contact a Utah bicycle advocacy group or the local police department’s public outreach division.

To learn more about what Salt Lake bike injury lawyer James Esparza can do for you and your loved ones after suffering the consequences of a negligent driver, call toll-free 800-745-4050 today.

It’s terrifying to learn that a medical device you’ve been relying on to assist you with a health issue may actually be causing you harm. With so many stories in the news, it’s possible that you may be feeling somewhat overwhelmed with information about hidden dangers in the marketplace.

The right knowledge can help you negotiate fear.

To help you better understand the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s recall system, we’re going to break down some of the terms you may commonly see in conjunction with safety alerts on healthcare products. Knowing more may help you protect yourself or a loved one from harm, and it may help you better establish your eligibility for a faulty medical device lawsuit.

A recall occurs when a product in the marketplace presents a hazard to consumers or is not up to the manufacturer’s quality standards. The original manufacturer may initiate a recall independently, but if there is any degree of safety risk it is likely that the FDA will become involved.

Types of Recalls and Safety Alerts

• Class I recall – This signifies the highest degree of safety risk to affected consumers. Using this product, or possibly even handling it, could cause serious injury or death.
• Class II recall – Here, use of or exposure to the recalled product could cause minor injuries, or there is a very slight chance of injuries that are more extreme.
• Class III recall – The hazard presented by the recalled product is minimal.
• Market withdrawal – This happens when there is a problem with a product that isn’t subject to FDA penalties toward the manufacturer. An example of this would be when a third party tampers with a batch of products that weren’t under the protection of the maker or distributor. Here, the problem is handled by removing the product from consumer access.
• Medical device safety alert – This may be coupled with a classed recall. It happens when a medical device is discovered to potentially cause substantial harm.

However, please remember that in any recall initiated for safety reasons, there is always a chance of a victim sustaining a serious injury.

Have you been injured by a recalled medical device? Are you unsure how to take the next step in obtaining compensation for your suffering? Reach out to a Salt Lake City personal injury attorney at the James Esparza Law Firm. To set up a free consultation, call 800-745-4050 today.

Pharmaceutical injuries do more than hurt the body. They can also damage the trust you place in the healthcare system. Determining who is liable for your injury and holding them accountable for the suffering you’ve endured is just as important to your recovery process as obtaining compensation for medical expenses and lost wages.

If you have decided to investigate your options for a Utah defective drug lawsuit, one of the first things you should know about is the Utah statute of limitations on drug liability claims.

The clock starts ticking the moment an injury is discovered.

“Statute of limitations” refers to the amount of time an individual has to file a claim for damages against the maker of a defective product or drug. Every state has its own set of laws governing the statute. In Utah, depending on the circumstances surrounding your case, the window of opportunity for a defective drug lawsuit expires:

• Two years after an injury is sustained
• Two years after an injury is discovered
• Two years after the injury should have been discovered.

Let’s look at each option in closer detail.

• Two years after an injury is sustained: With some defective pharmaceutical injuries, evidence of harm is immediate and unambiguously linked to the drug in question. For example, the manufacturer of a prescription painkiller neglects to include a label warning consumers against operating heavy machinery while taking the drug. Because of this, an individual is severely injured in an automobile accident. In this case, the statue of limitations would begin at the point of the accident.
• Two years after an injury is discovered: Especially when dealing with drug interactions and the long-term effects of chemicals on the body, it may not be possible to know that an injury was sustained for quite some time. For example, a hormone medication causes the victim to develop breast cancer, but they are not aware of this until the diagnosis three years after they stopped taking the drug. In this case, the time limit for filing a lawsuit would begin when the cancer is diagnosed.
• Two years after the injury should have been discovered: Some victims may avoid going to the doctor even after the symptoms of a Salt Lake City drug injury begins to manifest. In this case, Utah law will begin the statute at the point at which it should have become obvious to the victim that they needed to pursue diagnosis. For example, an asthma patient developed a lung disease from the medication in her inhaler, but refused to go to the doctor even after she’d been dealing with a harsh and persistent cough for several months. In this case, the statute began when the victim should have sought treatment for the cough.

What it boils down to is this: if you have been injured by a defective drug, do not waste any time. You have less time to recover damages than you might think. Seek the guidance of a Salt Lake drug injury attorney right away. To set up a no-cost consultation, call our office at 800-745-4050 today.

For the final installation in this three-part series, we’ll take a look at two collisions that can be considered at least partly the fault of the cyclist. Keep yourself safe by knowing the law!

Protecting Yourself From Common Bike-Car Collisions

5. Against Traffic Crash

What happens:

1. A cyclist, riding against traffic, is struck by a vehicle making a right turn onto the same street.
2. A cyclist, riding against traffic, is struck head-on by a vehicle driving on the same road.

How cyclists can protect themselves: Know the law: never ride against traffic. It’s a blatant safety hazard and against Utah cycling laws. In other words, if you are injured while riding this way, it is very unlikely you will be able to win a bike injury lawsuit even if the driver was also breaking the law at the time of the collision.

6. Sidewalk Slam

What happens: A cyclist riding on the sidewalk comes to a crosswalk or entryway and isn’t seen by a driver turning right. The driver hits the cyclist at the crosswalk or entryway.

How cyclists can protect themselves: There are four basic ways to avoid getting hit this way:

• Avoid riding on sidewalks! Though technically legal in the state of Utah, there are many exclusion areas, especially in Salt Lake City, where sidewalk riding is prohibited. Regardless, riding on the sidewalk is almost always a bad idea. There are always visibility problems for cyclists riding this way, in part because drivers don’t expect to see cyclists on the sidewalk. Keep in mind that many traffic safety studies have determined that riding on the sidewalk is at least twice as dangerous for the cyclist as riding in the street. You also pose a risk to pedestrians.
• Know the area. If you know that a stretch of sidewalk doesn’t have many cross streets or driveways and doesn’t see a lot of pedestrian traffic, it might be good for occasional use. Just stay aware of any cross streets or driveways and check for traffic in all directions before crossing.
• Maintain a low speed. Ride slowly enough to stop completely on short notice.
• Visibility, visibility, visibility. Utah law requires you to ride with a white headlight and red tail light (or reflectors) that have a visibility distance of at least 500 feet from a half hour before sunset to a half hour after sunrise, as well as any time visibility is impared. Wear reflective gear and brightly colored clothing.

If you’d like to know more about Utah bike laws as well as effective safety techniques, connect with your local police department or a Salt Lake bike advocacy group.

A Salt Lake City bike crash is terrifying and potentially life altering. To learn more about obtaining justice for your injuries, contact the legal team of the James Esparza Law Firm. Call our offices now at 801-272-9100, or toll free 800-745-4050 to set up a no-fee consultation.

Moms carry a lot of stuff when they travel, and there is a good reason for this. Children need to be fed, entertained, cleaned, and kept happy – even when on the go. A typical mom-mobile may have a diaper bag, extra wipes, sports equipment, dance shoes, overdue library books, snacks, bottles, extra clothes, toys, etc.

Being prepared is great. But, the loose objects in your car have the potential to become dangerous projectiles if you and your children are involved in a Salt Lake City car crash.

According to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA), everyday objects like cell phones, books, loose change, and toys are responsible for about 13,000 car accident injuries each year. Suppose your child’s backpack is sitting on the back seat. The average sixth-grader’s backpack weighs around 20 pounds. You are traveling at about 55 miles an hour when you crash. The backpack travels through the car with more than 1000 pounds of force. That is enough force to crush bones.

Even a lightweight object, like your spare change, can do significant damage at high speeds.

Obviously, you can’t store everything in the trunk. You need toys, snacks, and your cell phone handy.Salt Lake City car accident lawyer James Esparza offers these tips to help you and your children stay safe in the car:

• Keep heavy items stowed in the trunk or under a cargo net.
• Don’t forget that unsecured booster seats can also go flying. Keep the seat buckled in, even if your child isn’t in the car. Or, put it in the trunk.
• When you choose items for your car, look for lightweight options. For example, instead of using wipes in a plastic case, use a soft, refill pack.
• Give young children soft, light-weight toys like small stuffed animals and puppets to play with while you are driving.
• If you use snack containers, attach them to the seat with short straps.
• Any items that are not being used should be stowed away. Even your cell phone should be put in a storage compartment.

Keeping your family safe is important, but it’s hard to protect against reckless and irresponsible drivers. If you or your child is injured because of the negligence of another driver, you deserve justice and compensation. Contact the James Esparza Law Firm at 800-745-4050 to learn about Utah car accident lawsuits and your rights.

We all make mistakes, but a mistake during surgery can have fatal consequences. This is one reason that doctors and hospitals have embraced robotic surgery.

Most robotic surgeries are done using the da Vinci Surgical System, which is manufactured by Intuitive Surgical. The da Vinci robot is used for hysterectomies, mitral valve repair, gastric bypass, gall bladder surgery, and the removal of thyroid and prostate cancers.

The da Vinci robotic system is made up of three components: a surgeon’s console with a joystick, a 3D vision system, and a robotic cart with four surgical arms. Three of the arms manipulate surgical instruments while the fourth holds a camera.

Robotic surgery is a lot like playing a video game – except there are real life consequences. The image from the camera is shown on the vision system. The surgeon then uses the console to control the arms. His movements are scaled down and any unintended wobble is filtered out. This allows the surgeon to make very precise cuts on a very small scale. Because the surgeon can operate on a smaller scale than is possible with the human hand, there is less blood loss, less scarring, and a faster recovery time.

Unfortunately, there is a problem with the system. In May 2013, Intuitive Surgical sent an urgent medical device notification to users of the da Vinci system. The notification warned that a defective part could cause tissue burns during surgery.

The defective pieces are the “-09” and “-10” versions of the EndoWrist Hot Shears Monopolar Curved Scissors. These instruments are used to cut and coagulate tissue during surgical procedures. The scissors may develop energy-leaking micro cracks when they are cleaned and sterilized. These micro cracks may be too small to be seen with the naked eye, but they can increase the risk of inadvertent burns.

Intuitive Surgical is not recalling the defective scissors because there is no suitable replacement. Instead, they are asking surgeons to be aware of the risk and take necessary precautions. These precautions include not applying electrical energy unless the instrument tip is in direct contact with tissue, and paying close attention to any tissue near the instrument shaft or wrist.

The defective part is not the only problem facing Intuitive Surgical. The medical device company is currently facing 26 da Vinci lawsuits filed by patients who were injured during robotic surgery.

Injuries associated with the da Vinci robotic surgery system include:

• Surgical burns
• Excessive bleeding
• Punctured blood vessels or arteries
• Punctured organs
• Inflammation of the stomach lining
• Intestinal tearing
• Bowel injuries
• Punctured or cut ureters
• Vaginal cuff dehiscence
• Sepsis

If you were injured during surgery with the da Vinci Surgical System, you may be eligible for compensation for your medical bills, pain, and other losses. To learn more about da Vinci surgical robot lawsuits in Utah, contact Salt Lake City defective medical device attorney James Esparza at 800-745-4050.

Imagine waking up in your car. You’ve been in an accident. Your last memory is taking an Ambien before going to bed. You have no idea where you are and how you got there.

According to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA), Ambien is one of the 10 drugs most commonly found in impaired drivers. However, many of these drivers did not consciously intend to get behind the wheel. A side effect of Ambien is parasomnia, unusual behavior that occurs during deep sleep. Examples include sleepwalking, sleep eating, and sleep driving.

Ambien (zolpidem tartrate) is the most commonly prescribed sleep medication in the United States, and parasomnia is not the only side effect of the medication.

Side Effects of Ambien

• Parasomnia: Parasomnia occurs when the patient engages in waking activities while in deep sleep. There have been instances of sleep eating, sleepwalking, sleep driving, and even sleep shopping in patients taking Ambien. There have been several reports of sleep sex. One man became violent and attacked his roommate. These behaviors can affect the safety of the patient and the safety of others. The patient has no memory of the behavior when he wakes up.
• Hallucinations: Patients taking Ambien have reported vivid hallucinations. These hallucinations are both visual (seeing things that aren’t there) and auditory (hearing voices or sounds that don’t exist). As with parasomnia, there is a possibility that patients experiencing hallucinations could endanger themselves or others.
• Dissociation: Patients taking Ambien have reported feeling a sense of physical dissociation or emotional detachment from everyday life.
• Depression: Ambien is also linked to depression. Patients with no history of depression have suffered from severe depression after taking Ambien. Ambien may have been a factor in several suicide attempts.
• Temporary insomnia: Although Ambien is a sleep medicine, patients have reported increased levels of insomnia when taking Ambien.
• Ambien car accidents: In January, the US Food and Drug Administration warned that certain doses of Ambien may increase the risk of next-day car crashes, especially for women. Ambien is also linked to sleep driving crashes.
• Addiction: Ambien can be addictive when taken on a regular basis.

These Ambien side effects have the potential to cause serious injury or death, especially in patients who are unaware of the risks associated with the drug.

If you have suffered an injury or accident as the result of taking Ambien, you may have a Utah dangerous drug claim against Sanofi-Aventis, the maker of Ambien. We urge anyone who has suffered serious Ambien side effects to contact a Salt Lake City pharmaceutical injury lawyer. To learn more about Utah Ambien lawsuits contact the James Esparza Law Firm at 800-745-4050.

Robotic surgery isn’t science fiction. Hospitals like Salt Lake Regional Medical Center, Ogden Regional Medical Center, and Intermountain Medical Center routinely use robotic systems to perform procedures such as hysterectomies, laparoscopies, and prostate removal. Doctors believe there are many benefits to using surgical robots. The robotic system allows the doctor to make small, precise movements. Even complex surgery can be performed through a tiny opening. This means less blood loss, less scarring, and a faster recovery time. The patient can return to normal activities much sooner than with traditional surgery.

The da Vinci surgical robot system is the only robotic surgery system used in the United States. It was approved for use by the FDA in 2000. In 2012, it was used for over 400,000 surgeries. Many of these surgeries were hysterectomies.

According to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, robotic surgery isn’t always the best option for patients and may not lower the risk of complications. However, hospitals pay over $2 million for a da Vinci system. They need to schedule surgeries in order to pay for their equipment. Because of this, women may be pressured to consider robotic surgery. Although most women do well after robotic surgery, serious complications can occur.

A California woman was hospitalized after her bowels fell out of her vagina following a robotic hysterectomy. A New York woman died after robotic surgery burned her artery and intestines. Other women have been left with perforated intestines or colons. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) shows more than 500 reports of adverse events, including death, associated with the da Vinci robotic surgical system since January 1, 2012.

The FDA is currently investigating the robotic surgery system in an attempt to determine if injuries are caused by defects in the machine or by surgeons who receive inadequate training.

Surgeons who use the da Vinci robotic system undergo online training to learn the vocabulary needed to run the machines. The machine consists of a surgeon’s console and a cart that holds four robotic arms.  One arm has a camera that gives the surgeon a stereoscopic view of the surgery. The other arms hold surgical instruments. The surgeon controls the arms using the console. The robot edits out any natural tremors, so the surgeon’s movements are translated into very small, very precise actions.

A surgeon will learn to operate the machine by practicing using the tools on inanimate objects. He will then perform a practice surgery on a cadaver or animal in order to receive his training certificate. However, there are no standards for how many procedures must be completed before a surgeon does a real operation. In addition, a surgeon is not required to practice every possible procedure.

Injuries may be a mixture of both inadequate training and mechanical defects. In May 2013, Intuitive Surgical recently advised doctors that a defective part on the EndoWrist Hot Shears Monopolar Curved Scissors could cause tissue burns. The FDA recently recalled 30 surgical robotic devices because the systems may not have been adequately tested before being sent to US hospitals.

Want can you do if you suffered serious injury as a result of robotic surgery? Contact a Salt Lake City defective medical device attorney. You may be eligible for compensation for your medical bills, pain and suffering, lost wages, and other losses. To learn more about da Vinci surgical robot lawsuits in Utah, contact the James Esparza Law Firm at 800-745-4050.

Controlling diabetes is a challenge. Sometimes diet and exercise are not enough, and medication is needed. Januvia (sitagliptin) is a once-a-day pill that helps lower blood-sugar levels in patients with Type-II diabetes.

Januvia is an incretin mimetic. This means that the medication is an artificial version of the natural hormone incretin. Incretin is the hormone that tells your body to release insulin after you eat. Other incretin mimetics include Janumet, Victoza, Byetta, and Bydureon.

In May, the US Food and Drug Administration announced that the agency was looking into new evidence that Januvia and other incretin mimetics can increase the risk of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.

Researchers looked at samples of pancreas tissue from deceased patients with diabetes who took medications like Januvia. They found that a significant number of patients showed evidence of inflammation from pancreatitis and pancreatic-duct metaplasia, a cell change that often precedes pancreatic cancer.

The study has not been published.

This is not the first evidence linking Januvia to pancreatic cancer. A 2002 study in the journalGastroenterology was the first of several studies to link Januvia to an increased risk of cancer. That study linked Januvia to a 2.7-fold increased risk of pancreatic cancer.

The risk occurs because of the way Januvia works. As Januvia lowers blood-sugar levels, it suppresses the production of the DPP-4 protein. DPP-4 prevents the production of insulin, but it also helps the body fight cancer by limiting tumor growth. Januvia may also be associated with other cancers, such as thyroid cancers.Cancer is not the only dangerous side effect associated with Januvia. Januvia may cause kidney damage and pancreatitis.

The FDA has already added information about pancreatitis to Januvia’s warning labels. Pancreatitis is an inflammation of the pancreas that can cause malnutrition, kidney failure, and pancreatic cancer and may be fatal if untreated. Patients taking Januvia are six times more likely to develop pancreatitis than the general population.

Patients with existing kidney problems are advised not to take Jauvia.

Patients who suffer pancreatic cancer, pancreatitis, or kidney failure after treatment with Januvia may be eligible for monetary compensation through a Utah Januvia injury lawsuit. To learn more about Januvia injury lawsuits, please contact the James Esparza Law Firm at 800-745-4050, and ask to schedule a free consultation with a Salt Lake City medication injury attorney.

Insulin pumps are wearable medical devices that deliver a continuous dose of insulin to patients suffering from Type-1 or Type-2 diabetes. Diabetics who use insulin pumps are able to work, go to school, and enjoy daily activities without having to stop for an insulin injection.

Because they are convenient, insulin pumps are very popular. However, these medical devices are not without risk. If the patient does not use the machine correctly, there is a risk that he will receive too much or too little insulin. Most insulin pump injuries are the result of:

• Lack of education or training on the correct use of the device
• Failure to follow device instructions
• Failure to monitor blood glucose during periods of high activity
• Inappropriate patient selection by a healthcare provider
• Mistakes in calculating insulin dose
• Lack of medical follow-up
• Lack of support during emergencies

A patient who receives too much or too little insulin may suffer from ketoacidosis, hypoglycemia (too low blood sugar), or hyperglycemia (too high blood sugar).

Insulin pumps, like all medical devices, can malfunction. There have been several medical device recalls associated with defective insulin pumps produced by the Animas Corporation or by Medtronic, Inc.

• In November 2008, Animas issued a nationwide recall of insulin pumps after learning that a defect in the battery cap could cause the machine to reset and deliver the wrong dose of insulin.
• In July 2009, Medtronic recalled the MiniMed Paradigm insulin pump. Defects in the tube delivering insulin could interrupt the flow of insulin to the patient.
• In February 2011, Animas recalled a batch of malfunctioning cartridges that could leak and deliver the wrong dose of insulin.
• In April 2013, the FDA recalled the Animas 2020 insulin pump because a defective component could trigger a false alarm or warning.
• The FDA also warned that the Animas 2020 insulin pump has a software malfunction that will prevent the pump from working after December 31, 2015.
• In July 2013, the FDA recalled MiniMed Paradigm Insulin Infusion Sets because fluid in the tubing connector could temporarily block the vents that allow the pump to properly prime, causing too much or too little insulin to be delivered.

Diabetics who were injured or experienced diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperglycemia, or hypoglycemia after using an insulin pump should discuss their case with a Salt Lake City defective device lawyer. They may be eligible for compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, and other damages through a Utah insulin pump lawsuit.

Salt Lake City personal injury attorney James Esparza takes defective medical device claims on a contingency basis. This means that you don’t pay unless he wins your case. To learn more, contact the James Esparza Law Firm at 800-745-4050.

Pregnancy is supposed to be a happy time. Women glow as they eagerly await the new addition to the family.

The truth is that pregnancy is uncomfortable; each day brings a new ache or discomfort. In addition, pregnancy is emotional. Hormonal fluctuations cause mood swings and can worsen or initiate depression. One in five women suffers from depression during pregnancy.

Depression is often treated with drugs called serotonin-specific reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs. SSRIs include many popular medications, including Prozac, Zoloft, Paxil, Cymbalta, and Lexapro. SSRIs can help control depression, but these drugs have been linked to a serious birth defect, called persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN).

PPHN is a birth defect that affects a newborn’s lungs. A fetus does not use the lungs while in the womb because the placenta supplies all the oxygen the baby needs through the umbilical cord. Since the blood doesn’t need to be oxygenated in the lungs, it goes directly to the heart through a blood vessel called the ductus arteriosus. In most newborns, the ductus arteriosus blood vessel permanently closes with the first breaths. Blood is then redirected into the lungs where it becomes oxygenated before it goes to the heart.

When a newborn has PPHN, the ductus arteriosus does not close. Blood doesn’t enter the lungs, so the heart can’t get enough oxygen. Symptoms of PPHN include:

• Rapid breathing (tachypnea)
• Low blood oxygen (hypoxemia)
• Rapid heart rate (tachycardia)
• Heart murmurs
• Respiratory distress
• Blue tone to the skin (cyanosis)

The lack of oxygen causes stress to the heart and other vital organs, such as the liver, kidney, and brain. Newborns with SSRI PPHN are at risk of many serious complications, including:

• Seizures
• Shock
• Heart failure
• Kidney failure
• Brain hemorrhage or stroke
• Permanent organ damage
• Death

Infants who survive PPHN may suffer long-term disabilities, including intellectual disability, developmental disorders, hearing loss, respiratory problems, and seizure disorders.

A 2006 study in the New England Journal of Medicine, reported that infants whose mothers took SSRIs during the third trimester of pregnancy were six times more likely to develop PPHN than infants whose mothers did not take antidepressants. However, SSRIs continue to be marketed and prescribed to pregnant women. Why?

There have been numerous studies evaluating the association between the use of SSRIs during pregnancy and PPHN. A few of the studies gave conflicting results. The FDA maintains that it cannot reach a conclusion about the safety of the drugs, but the evidence is stacking up.

A 2012 study based on 1.6 million births in Sweden, Finland, Denmark, Iceland, and Norway found that newborns born to women who were treated with SSRIs in late pregnancy were at least twice as likely to suffer from PPHN.

If you took Paxil, Zoloft, Prozac, or another antidepressant during your pregnancy, and your newborn was born with PPHN or another birth defect, you may qualify to participate in a Utah pharmaceutical injury lawsuit. To learn more about how an SSRI birth defect claim can help with medical bills and care for a disabled child, contact a Salt Lake City dangerous drug attorney. To schedule a free consultation, call the James Esparza Law Firm at 800-745-4050.

Millions of women suffer from stress urinary incontinence (SUI), the involuntary loss of urine during physical activities such as sneezing, coughing, laughing, or running. SUI is not just inconvenient; it can be embarrassing, and it can keep a woman from participating in her favorite activities.

SUI is most commonly treated with a bladder sling. A bladder sling is a strip of synthetic, mesh-like material that is used to support the bladder and urethra and keep them closed during physical activity. The sling is surgically inserted through small incisions during outpatient surgery.

A bladder sling that works as intended can change a woman’s life. She can laugh without fear and exercise without worrying about embarrassment. However, not every bladder sling surgery is successful. Bladder slings are associated with painful complications.

Studies have found that more than twenty percent of women who receive vaginal slings suffer complications. These complications include:

• Pelvic pain
• Abdominal pain
• Infection
• Internal bleeding
• Difficulty urinating
• Urgent need to urinate
• Recurrent incontinence
• Pain during intercourse
• Erosion of the vagina or other organs
• Vaginal scarring
• Vaginal disfigurement
• Organ perforation
• Mesh contraction
• Psychological injuries

Removing a sling that has caused injury is not a simple procedure. Because the sing is embedded in the woman’s tissue, multiple revision surgeries may be needed. The patient will have to avoid strenuous activity for at least a month after each procedure. She may be unable to urinate without the aid of a catheter and will need to give up swimming and sexual intercourse until she has fully recovered.

Have you suffered painful side effects from a bladder sling? Contact a Salt Lake City medical device attorney, and learn how you can join the thousands of women who have filed bladder-sling injury lawsuits. To find out if you qualify for compensation, schedule a free consultation with Utah personal injury attorney James Esparza. To schedule an appointment, call the James Esparza Law Firm at 800-745-4050.

Fosamax, the osteoporosis medication linked to rare bone fractures and birth defects, may also increase the risk of throat cancer.

How can a drug that strengthens bones cause esophageal cancer? Bisphosphonates like Fosamax, Boniva, and Actonel irritate the lining of the esophagus, causing esophagitis or esophageal ulcers. These conditions are known risk factors for esophageal cancer.

In 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Drug Safety Communication,announcing that it was evaluating the link between bisphosphonates like Fosamax and esophageal cancer. At that time, there was conflicting evidence as to whether or not bisphosphonates could cause cancer of the esophagus. A British study found no link between the use of bisphosphonates and cancer of the esophagus, but other studies found an increased risk of esophageal cancer in patients who took bisphosphonates for more than three years and in patients who had ten or more prescriptions for bisphosphonates.

In 2012, doctors at Northwestern University reviewed the FDA’s own Adverse Events Reporting System (FDA AERS) database records from 1996 to 2010. They searched for instances of esophageal cancer associated with bisphosphonate use. These are the findings:

• 128 cases of bisphosphonate-associated esophageal cancer
  • 96 cases associated with Fosamax
  • 14 cases associated with Actonel
  • 10 cases associated with Boniva
  • 8 cases associated with injectable bisphosphonates

In 2009, there were only 23 reports of esophageal cancer associated with Fosamax, and none associated with other oral bisphosphonates. The researchers believe these numbers show that the risk of cancer from osteoporosis drugs is much higher than indicated by prior studies. The findings were presented at 48th the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The FDA is still investigating the risks associated with Fosamax, but you don’t have to wait for their decision. If you suffered esophageal cancer after using Fosamax, science is on your side. Consult a Salt Lake City pharmaceutical injury attorney to learn about Fosamax cancer claims. You may be eligible for compensation for your medical bills, lost wages, and loss of quality of life. To learn more, schedule a free consultation with the James Esparza Law Firm at 800-745-4050.

Have you ever had a doctor tell you to put an ice pack or bag of frozen peas on an injury? R.I.C.E., a mnemonic that stands for Rest, Ice, Compression, and Elevation, is the recommended treatment for many soft-tissue injuries, including strains, sprains, pulled muscles, pulled ligaments, and pain and swelling after surgery. The ice reduces pain and swelling and speeds up healing.

Cold compression therapy takes this one step further by providing cold therapy and compression at the same time.  Continuous cold therapy devices, or ice machines, circulate ice water through a pad. They are designed to lower the temperature of injured tissue in order to reduce the tissue’s metabolic rate during healing. These devices are more effective than using an ice pack or bag of frozen peas. However, unfortunately, the devices are also associated with severe side effects.

Cold Therapy Injuries and Side Effects

• Loss of circulation to the area being treated
• Skin damage
• Peripheral nerve injury
• Chronic pain
• Tingling or numbness
• Frostbite
• Scarring
• Disfigurement
• Tissue damage
• Permanent nerve damage
• Tissue death or necrosis
• Infection
• Amputation

These effects occur when a patient uses the machine for too long, the skin becomes super-cooled, and the body decreases blood flow to the area. Side effects can occur in as little as one hour. Because these side effects are so serious, the FDA has warned manufacturers of continuous cold therapy devices about the lack of temperature control and clear directions. EB Ice, Breg Polar Care, and Donjoy Iceman have received warnings from the FDA. At least one device, the Breg Polar Care machine, has been recalled.

If you have suffered an injury after using a cryotherapy machine, we urge you to speak to a Salt Lake City defective medical device attorney. You may be eligible for compensation for medical your medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages related to your injuries. To learn more about Utah cold therapy lawsuits, contact the James Esparza Law Firm at 800-745-4050, and ask to schedule a free consultation with an SLC personal injury lawyer.

You were surprised when your doctor told you that you have high cholesterol. After all, you eat right, get plenty exercise, and feel great. However, your doctor said sometimes a healthy lifestyle isn’t enough. He prescribed Lipitor.

You took the drug as directed. At your next check-up, your cholesterol looked great, but your blood sugar was high. Your doctor wasn’t worried. He told you to keep up the great work with diet and exercise. The following year, you were diagnosed with diabetes.

Lipitor is the best-selling drug in the US, but new evidence shows that statins like Lipitor (atorvastatin), Crestor (rosuvastatin), and Zocor (simvastatin) may increase the risk of developing Type 2 diabetes.

The elevated diabetes risk was first observed during a 2008 Crestor study of nearly 18,000 patients. Most recently, researchers in Canada conducted a study of 500,000 Ontario residents. They found that patients taking Lipitor had a 22-percent-higher risk of developing diabetes than patients who were not taking statins. Patients taking Crestor had an 18-percent-higher risk, and patients taking Zocor had a 10-percent-higher risk. Patients taking Pravachol (pravastatin) were less likely to develop diabetes. The study was published online in the journal BMJ.  Several other studies have found similar results.

What does this mean for you?  When you are prescribed a medication, you have the right to know about any associated risks. You were not told that Lipitor could increase your risk of diabetes. Patients who develop diabetes after taking Lipitor, Crestor, or Zocor may be eligible to file a Utah pharmaceutical injury claim against the maker of the drug. To learn more, contact a Salt Lake City pharmaceutical injury attorney.

Salt Lake City personal injury attorney James Esparza is currently investigating statin diabetes claims. To discuss your case, please call the James Esparza Law Firm at 800-745-4050. The initial consultation is free.

Do you have a hip implant? A hip implant is a prosthetic joint used to relieve arthritis pain and improve mobility. A prosthetic hip can be life-changing, but not always in a positive way. Hip implants are associated with numerous side effects including:

• Deep vein thrombosis
• Joint dislocation
• Bone loss
• Metal sensitivity
• Metal toxicity
• Nerve damage
• Chronic pain
• Hip implant failure

Hip implants should last 15 to 20 years, but several recalls of hip implants due to premature failure of the device have occurred. The latest recall was announced on July 11, 2013. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. issued an Urgent Medical Device Recall for the LPS Lower Extremity Dovetail Intercalary component of its artificial hips. On August 1, 2013, the FDA elevated the DePuy recall to a Class-I recall status. A Class-I recall is issued when there is likelihood that a defective medical device will cause serious injury or death.

The recall was issued because the LPS Lower Extremity Dovetail Intercalary component may fracture under normal physiologic loads. This means that the hip could malfunction while the patient is engaged in an everyday activity. There is a greater risk of failure if the patient weighs more than 200 pounds or is very active.

If the LPS Lower Extremity Dovetail Intercalary fractures, the patient will experience severe hip pain and an immediate loss of hip function. The patient may also experience nerve damage, muscle damage, or tendon damage. If the damage is severe, amputation may be necessary. All patients with fractured components will need to undergo hip revision surgery in order to remove and replace the device.

Hip revision surgery is a risky procedure. Patients who have the LPS Lower Extremity Dovetail Intercalary component cannot simply have it removed. The hip is like a ticking time bomb inside their bodies.

This is not the first DePuy artificial hip recall. In August 2010, DePuy voluntarily recalled its Metal-On-Metal ASR hip implants because of a high failure rate.

If you have suffered hip implant failure, you deserve accountability and compensation. Contact a Salt Lake City defective medical device attorney to learn about Utah hip implant failure lawsuits. You may be eligible for compensation for your medical bills, surgical costs, lost wages, pain and suffering, and loss of quality of life. To schedule a free consultation, contact the James Esparza Law Firm at 800-745-4050.