Contact us today for a FREE no-obligation initial consultation

law done differently!

Tag

Mirena injury lawyer Archives | James Esparza Law Group

Mirena Patients Allege Permanent Blurred Vision, Blindness

By | Mirena

A Mirena lawsuit filed by a woman alleging the intrauterine contraceptive device caused her to suffer pseudotumor cerebri – characterized by severe headaches, blurred vision and permanent 40 percent vision lost in her right eye – is moving forward.

Plaintiff previously overcame defendant drug manufacturer Bayer’s motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Now, a recently-updated docket in Stanley v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. reveals the parties are engaged in various Daubert motion hearings, arguing for submission of their respective expert witnesses’ testimony into evidence.

Daubert Standard hearings are standard in these product liability lawsuits because they rely so heavily on scientific evidence to prove causation and damages. It’s a standard that was adopted into the Federal Rules of Evidence (and soon after by many states) following the 1993 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Daubert v. Merrel Dow Pharmaceuticals. In that case, the court agreed on several guidelines for the admission of expert witness scientific testimony. These include the judge as gatekeeper, relevance and reliability, analysis of scientific methodology and review of illustrative factors.  Read More

Mirena IUD Injury Lawyers Explain Symptoms of Intracranial Hypertension

By | Mirena

Mirena & Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

When it comes to birth control protection, an increasing number of obstetricians and gynecologists are recommending patients opt for an intrauterine device (also known as an IUD). A recent study published in the journal Contraception reveals IUD and implant use is now the No. 3 most commonly-used form of reversible contraception for women between the ages of 25 and 44 – after “the pill” and the condom. Planned Parenthood reports a 91 percent increase in the number of implants and IUDs used by patents in just the last five years. Mirena IUD injury lawyer

Mirena IUD injury lawyers recognize the popularity is because IUDs have generally been deemed convenient and effective – long-acting (some models up to 10 years), don’t require daily action and can be removed at any time. Unlike copper IUDs, Mirena is hormone-based, designed to release a set amount of the hormone for up to five years.

Unfortunately, the Mirena IUD has not been without the potential for serious risk, including the development of a condition called intracranial hypertension. The formal medical term is “pseudotumor cerebri.” This condition has been linked before to women who had taken: Depo-Provera, Norplant and certain types of emergency contraception. Now, there is evidence Mirena too may be a catalyst for intracranial hypertension. This is not a minor side effect, but often extremely painful and sometimes resulting in permanent blindness. Thousands of lawsuits have followed, alleging patients were not adequately warned of this potential danger.

While Bayer, the manufacturer of Mirena, warns about more common side effects, such as embedment, perforation and expulsion, the official warning makes no mention of intracranial hypertension. Our Salt Lake City Mirena IUD injury lawyers know from a Utah product liability standpoint, these are the grounds on which lawsuits may prevail.  Read More

Top